-
Posts
48 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Posts posted by freppy
-
-
Hi All,
Just following up on this topic since the BRIDGE CREW CRL has not been changed yet...
Was it decided that the three lines are acceptable on the gauntlet?
https://databank.501st.com/databank/Costuming:IC_imperial_bridge_crew
vs https://databank.501st.com/databank/Costuming:TI_TIE_Pilot_ANH
Can the CRL be updated as per the previous comment? Or is there a reason it has not been updated?
Black Gauntlet Gloves (Bridge Crew)
For 501st approval:- Black, leather or leather-like, enclosed fingered, non-textured, fitted gauntlet style.
- No buckles, straps, or decorative stitching are permitted.
- Three straight lines, on the back of the hand, are optional.
For level two certification (if applicable): - Gloves are made of leather.
- ROTJ bridge crew shall wear gauntlet style gloves.
- ANH and ESB bridge crew shall not wear gloves.
-
Woohoo - just saw the CRL is now updated to be correct base don the image from the movie.
https://databank.501st.com/databank/File:Krennikcapediagram.jpeg
Thanks for updating it Nocternus!
-
Magnoli is another option... https://www.magnoliclothiers.com/director-cloak-other-garments-p-714.html
-
Hey Jake,
The maker was Pinkingshears cosplay on Etsy - https://www.etsy.com/au/shop/PinkingShearsCostume
I don't know if she does just the cape - though I am sure you could message her and ask for a custom order of just the cape!
-
Though I had a hard time finding even these shots showing that seam!!
-
And I will be having my cape made to this new spec, especially given that it is quite clear that this matches these scenes in the movie more accurately.
If anyone has any evidence showing that other scenes have the line placed further forward as per the original cape diagram, PLEASE post them here!!
If there is evidence of both stitching arrangements, then both cape diagrams should be approve-able!!
-
Just noticed there is an 'Update CRL' thread!
I've posted in there now... Apologies for putting this in the wrong section!
-
Hi All,
The person making my cape missed the top tuck in the yoke section around the shoulders (they were using an older pattern), and when finding this out - I noticed that the shots from the movie don't quite match the CRL cape diagram! On the cape diagram found on the CRL - the line between section 4 and 7, and between 11 and 7 - I believe is shown in the INCORRECT position!
First attached photo is the current cape schematic, showing the separation line in the same line as the FIRST line from the front of the cape (the one from 9/10 & 2/3).
Second and third images shows the movie, where this line is ACTUALLY inline with the SECOND line from the front of the cape (the one from 10/12 & 3/5).
Fourth attached image is a quick amended diagram I put together to show where I believe the actual separation line (4/7 & 11/7) should sit.
I know in the CRL it only specifies that there needs to be 3 panels (and location isn't specific, other than following the diagram), but for accuracy I believe it should be moved further back than what is shown in the current cape diagram!
Please let me know thoughts if I have mistaken anything, or am seeing something wrong!
Also, if I am correct - how does this get changed on the CRL?
-
Also here is another shot showing it further back...
-
Just opening this up again as I had an issue with the cape!
On the cape diagram found on the CRL - the line between section 4 and 7, and between 11 and 7 - I believe is shown in the INCORRECT position!
First attached photo is the current cape schematic, showing the separation line in the same line as the FIRST line from the front of the cape (the one from 9/10 & 2/3).
Second image shows the movie, where this line is ACTUALLY inline with the SECOND line from the front of the cape (the one from 10/12 & 3/5).
Third attached image is a quick amended diagram I put together to show where I believe the actual separation line (4/7 & 11/7) should sit.
I know in the CRL it only specifies that there needs to be 3 panels (and location isn't specific, other than following the diagram), but for accuracy I believe it should be moved further back than what is shown in the current cape diagram!
Please let me know thoughts if I have mistaken anything, or am seeing something wrong!
Also, if I am correct - how does this get changed on the CRL?
Warrant Officer / Staff Officer / Bridge Crew gloves
in CRL Updates
Posted
Aha OK! SO until there is any evidence for these specific lines (as present in Tie Reserve etc.), we must only have gloves that have no decorative stitching at all... Thank you for the clarification.