Jump to content

CommanderBaz

IOC Member[IOC]
  • Posts

    240
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CommanderBaz

  1. i get the impression some people like the sound of their voice/opinion a little too much.

    Please dont be arrogant or dismissive just because we disagree.

    There seems to be more voices for than against here with compelling reasons.

    Hask should have a crl or otherwise i think Hux (an overrated character) should have its crl downgraded.

    Now im not wasting anymore time arguing the toss for toss sake.

    Lets go to work!

    Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk

  2. Facial specifics isnt in question here. This has been mentioned a number of times. It's costume differences.
    Err facial specifics is part of the costume surely?

    Grand Moff Tarkin is my point which you seem to have bypassed.



    Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk

  3. I’m a cleared level 3 Imperator for Staff Officer - emulation chosen was Commander Praji.

    There was no specifics about facial hair or scars etc so hence why it does not have its own crl.

    If a Character like Hask has specifics including facial hair, scar then yes it should have its own crl after all that’s why Grand Moff Tarkin has his own crl due to the face/hair features - or should we downgrade that crl to a generic admiral?

    I really don’t see why we can’t accept this and just keep arguing the toss to be frank?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  4. So at the beginning of this discussion we had five points in which the generic model differs that was the reason to split the CRL in a Generic and a Hask version:

    • Colour 
    • Rank bars 
    • Belt/Shoes 
    • Design 
    • Code Cylinder 

    The belt/shoes were dropped later and the color was at least questioned,

     

    So at the end of the day there are three points left that define that Hask has to be an separate CRL. Rank Bars, Design and Code Cylinder. I'd say congratulations, these are the same arguments that were used to justify e.g. why there's only one CRL for the line officers. 

     

    I can only agree with [mention=10917]Tentayena[/mention] on this one. Nobody denies that Hask shouldn't be a wearable variant as the character has a stressed role for the plot. But the intended decision to split the CRLs mismatches the procdures of the past.

     


    “Procedures” is that what you mean?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  5. For Robert;

     

    My question is now: Why not consider trying to become an intergral part of IOC by more interaction and involvement than basically coming from nowhere and idleness on IOC to becoming its DL?

    With all due respect this is being repeated because despite your lengthy waffling on you did not actually answer the question.

    Feel free to waffle but within it you actually do need to answer the question which from what I read in your response you did not.






     

     




    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  6. For Robert:

    Quoting your response;

    How am I more imperial than you?  

    Well, I think the rebels are filth, I believe the emperor was elected, the Jedi were not and it is a good thing those baby stealing traitors do not exist as an organization or as individuals anymore.

    Just kidding.  I don’t know you well, so I can’t tell you if I am more imperial than you.  I am guessing you have me beat with the accent, so I will leave you with this.  I believe that a good imperial “Serves the realm”.  That is my definition of an imperial.  If you believe that too, then I am not MORE imperial than you, but I am not less either.

     

    What I find amazing about this statement is;

    1. I was stood behind you at Celebration 2016 and you haven't even realised or bothered to see who I am.

    2. You haven't even bothered to really notice I am level 3 Imperator 

    So I say to you yes I am more Imperial than you.

     

    Just kidding in an election is pretty slapdash to be honest.

     

    My question is now: Why not consider trying to become an intergral part of IOC by more interaction and involvement than basically coming from nowhere and idleness on IOC to becoming its DL?

     

     

     

  7. Question to ID-7655 Robert G. Barker (Garrison Corellia)

     

    You are in favour of a closed FB page - but are you aware of the Limitations of FB?

     

    Why would you take a fully practical functioning forum and almost archive it in favour of a FB group that basically designed purely for "social media"?

     

    Given your inactivity on the IOC forum how can you suddenly decry & denounce it without having fully explored it and its tools etc?

     

    Are you planning to make the IOC mainly US friendly rather than considering worldwide members such as myself?

  8. Question to ID-7655 Robert G. Barker (Garrison Corellia)

     

    Quote:  "but it doesn’t suit the needs of most imperial officers in the legion."

     

    Please define what this means?

    Are you level 2 or 3 in the IOC?

    Have you taken the IOC seriously ever?

    What makes you more imperial than say me? 

  9. Questions to ID-7655 Robert G. Barker (Garrison Corellia)

     

    Why wait until the elections to become active on the forum?

    Why wait until now to become a full member of the IOC? Is this solely for the purpose of getting elected?

    Given we are a worldwide organisation why do you not value the importance of IOC forum as a valuable tool to aid this?

     

     

  10. As Kris says, and is the same case as your blaster/holster, any change to a cleared costume will require it to be re submitted for UKG attendance.

    Thanks Pete - shall i do a new UKG thread in armoury secriob and do i need to do full dress pics wearing it? Or would top half shot of tunic etc suffice?
×
×
  • Create New...