snipedoc2001

My two cents on this is I complete agree with it.  Over at FISD, they try to find how the armor is supposed to be worn.  If you look at ANH or ESB, you can see plenty of malfunctions, shoulders backwards or falling off, armor duct taped on, biceps missing cover strips, Mr. No Stripes (A TK without tube stripes on the bucket), etc.  IMO the CRL should be based off how the officer is supposed to look, not how they look in a specific scene or reference material.

My two cents on this is I complete agree with it.  Over at FISD, they try to find how the armor is supposed to be worn.  If you look at ANH or ESB, you can see plenty of malfunctions, shoulders backwards or falling off, armor duct taped on, biceps missing cover strips, Mr. No Stripes (A TK without tube stripes on the bucket), etc.  IMO the CRL should be based off how the officer is supposed to look, not how they look in a specific scene or reference material.

My two cents on this is I complete agree with it.  Over at FISD, they try to find how the armor is supposed to be worn.  If you look at ANH or ESB, you can see plenty of malfunctions, shoulders backwards or falling off, armor duct taped on, biceps missing cover strips, Mr. No Stripes (A TK without tube stripes on the bucket), etc.  IMO the CRL should be based off how the officer is supposed to look, not how they look in a specific scene or reference material.