Jump to content

lantern2745

IOC Member[IOC]
  • Posts

    2,447
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    114

Posts posted by lantern2745

  1. 8 hours ago, buckrogersbarker said:

     

    Sky my first concern and the concern of this administration is that all members be able to do the LFL licensed character that they want to do.  We have a history of advocating for women's costumes and CRLs where it had previously met a lot of resistance at both the LMO office and previous IOC administrations.  Where there had been resistance before can be discussed in a separate thread or you can speak to the IOC detachment's diversity officer if you want to know more.

    I can't speak for any LMO administrations having not served on one.

    I can speak for previous IOC administrations having been your predecessor, and working with my predecessor and his.

    Where has there been resistance to CRLs for women?

    The CRL models could certainly be updated to feature a more diverse array of members, but in my time and in my various roles I was never privy to specific CRLs for women or feminine presenting members being denied for that reason alone.

    Seeing as you brought it up here, I'd appreciate elaboration on it here.

    - Jeff

  2. Howdy!

    I would tweak a thing or two.

    The final line for level one tall boots is redundant. It already says a stretch panel or zipper may be present in a previous line.

    I would require silver clips for the code cylinders at level one.

    And I would add a line saying the rank tiles/configuration must come from a licsensed source.  As it reads, it seems like you can make up what ever you want - including wacky colors.

    Also the face character section seems superfluous.  If it's not required for a configuration, it doesn't really need to be there.

     

    Just some of my thoughts.  For what they're worth.

    - Jeff

  3. Hey @Hollywoodtodd !  The first thing you'll need to do is request full IOC access in the link below.

    https://www.imperialofficer.com/forum/index.php?/topic/1670-501st-ioc-member-status-requests/page/174/&tab=comments#comment-176590

     

    Then you'll be able to see the section that you'll need to create your TOD in.

    https://www.imperialofficer.com/forum/index.php?/forum/47-imperial-hall-of-commemoration/

     

    Hope that helps!

    - Jeff

  4. Me again.

    And the personal attacks need to stop.

    Let's stick to facts.

    "Oh that's rich Jeff, you started with nuking the LMOs" I can already hear some say.

    I came in hot, but what I said (other than expressing my disdain for the Army CRLs) was factual.

    The "back rule" isn't a rule, it's more of a suggestion.

    And it gets applied unevenly.

    But not maliciously so.

    Let's table the name calling portion of this dumpster fire, and figure out why the LMO team doesn't think there's enough reference.

    - Jeff

     

  5. This is complete and utter poodoo.

    Not once was I (former DL) notified that this would not be accepted, or I'd have yelled from the top of this hill that I'll die on, that this was a bad decision.

    Mountain Trooper is based solely on a toy.

    Captain Cardinal is 90 percent based on a toy (that has the wrong helmet!).

    All the Spec Ops Army CRLs are based on crudely drawn comics, and look like bargain basement SWAT team members - which is why we didn't want them.

    95 percent of the clones died before order 66, thus shouldn't even be 501st.

    But because the back of a black costume isn't seen in full daylight, you're gonna nix it?

    This is precisely the flawed reasoning that made me vote NO for your ratification.

    - Jeff

  6. Because I can already hear people howling that there isn't enough screen reference, I'll preemptively ask where the first image came from, and if there is a view from the back.

    It looks really cool though!

    - Jeff

     

    Edit:  I saw in another post where it was from. Topps cards. Who knew?

    Rhetorical question, Bob knew. Haha

  7. On 1/19/2021 at 2:56 PM, 1010nguyens said:

    Hey everyone!


    I was looking into doing a ROTJ Navy Trooper build. While grabbing screen caps, I noticed that this one trooper's compad has a different color scheme to the one in the CRL:

     

    ComPad.thumb.jpg.b6d3f71fef6db734abd8a91619ea5150.jpg

     

    I was wondering, would I be approved if I went with this color scheme? Or would it depend on my GML?

    That almost looks like the red black white black buttons are obscured by the com pad pocket.  I'd guess it's the same as the rest just partially hidden?

    - Jeff

×
×
  • Create New...